collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case  (Read 2372 times)

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187

Offline follow maggie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 3323
  • Location: Fargo
  • Just me, just being a nomad
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2024, 09:53:15 AM »
Hopefully it spreads.

Offline BA Mongor

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2015
  • Posts: 369
  • Location: Washington Coast
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2024, 04:13:10 PM »
Finally.
I agree, and hope it goes nation wide to STOP their arrogance in thinking they can go wherever they want, when they want!
 

Offline yogru

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2019
  • Posts: 101
  • Location: Everett
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2024, 04:20:54 PM »
The landowners were awarded nominal damages of $1 for the violations. 
 :twocents:

Offline CarbonHunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2014
  • Posts: 1197
  • Location: Carbonado
  • Groups: RMEF, WSB
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2024, 06:30:22 PM »
Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

Has anyone seen the WDFW doing this on private property without permission or a warrant?

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10655
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2024, 09:25:15 AM »


Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

If I remember correctly, they received a report of on-going hunting violations on the property.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk


 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Thoughts on all copper shot. by JBG
[Today at 12:36:42 PM]


White hot muzzleloading pellets by WoolyRunner
[Today at 12:25:46 PM]


Cheap but great bino's! by TeacherMan
[Today at 12:14:55 PM]


Leopold Freedom RDS Mount by M_ray
[Today at 11:24:50 AM]


Hunting alone - May need support by pianoman9701
[Today at 10:47:14 AM]


Replacing the keypad on a gun safe? by JBG
[Today at 10:06:28 AM]


2025 Montana alternate list by TT13
[Today at 09:57:59 AM]


Diagonal groups shooting coaching? by Sunbkpk
[Today at 09:43:30 AM]


25*06 by Sunbkpk
[Today at 09:09:18 AM]


Lost bino harness with binoculars and range finder by ghosthunter
[Today at 08:36:00 AM]


2025 fishing season wrap up by Alchase
[Today at 07:58:02 AM]


I more or less bought a “mystery bag” that has turned into an adventure by JDHasty
[Today at 07:57:45 AM]


New civil infraction? Will dent the grouse hunting? by HardCorpsHuntr
[Yesterday at 09:54:32 PM]


Success! by Boar88
[Yesterday at 09:37:26 PM]


Blue Tongue and EHD outbreak in NE Washington by blumtnelkndeer
[Yesterday at 09:13:19 PM]


peaches ridge rifle bull oct 20th hunt by scoutdog346
[Yesterday at 06:20:45 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 05:23:24 PM]


Yakima reservation sheep by Klickitatsteelie
[Yesterday at 02:36:22 PM]


2025 Mt. St. Helens success? by Pigfuz
[Yesterday at 02:28:22 PM]


GROUSE 2025...the Season is looming! by EnglishSetter
[Yesterday at 12:44:49 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal