collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case  (Read 755 times)

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187

Offline follow maggie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 3030
  • Location: Fargo
  • Just me, just being a nomad
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2024, 09:53:15 AM »
Hopefully it spreads.

Offline BA Mongor

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2015
  • Posts: 283
  • Location: Washington Coast
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2024, 04:13:10 PM »
Finally.
I agree, and hope it goes nation wide to STOP their arrogance in thinking they can go wherever they want, when they want!
 

Offline yogru

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2019
  • Posts: 77
  • Location: Everett
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2024, 04:20:54 PM »
The landowners were awarded nominal damages of $1 for the violations. 
 :twocents:

Offline CarbonHunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2014
  • Posts: 591
  • Location: Carbonado
  • Groups: RMEF, WSB
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2024, 06:30:22 PM »
Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

Has anyone seen the WDFW doing this on private property without permission or a warrant?

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10320
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2024, 09:25:15 AM »


Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

If I remember correctly, they received a report of on-going hunting violations on the property.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk


 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

WestPort Jetty Advice Please by GWP
[Today at 04:49:29 PM]


Colorado Results 2024 by jstone
[Today at 04:46:43 PM]


bull by kodiak06
[Today at 03:38:34 PM]


Anyone going to Wyoming this fall? by geauxtigers
[Today at 03:32:35 PM]


2024 Special Permit Draw Results by Twispriver
[Today at 03:12:12 PM]


Help- stuck action screw by Ridgeratt
[Today at 03:02:13 PM]


Washington state record blacktail by Sundance
[Today at 12:05:21 PM]


Oregon Seed numbers 2024 by Ricochet
[Today at 11:03:47 AM]


Arizona by WAcoueshunter
[Today at 10:03:41 AM]


Area 11 Opener Next Week? by cavemann
[Today at 10:03:37 AM]


Lingcod Area 10 Advice by Gentrys
[Today at 09:59:29 AM]


Bearpaw Season - Spring 2024 by bearpaw
[Today at 09:15:44 AM]


Panhandle north Idaho elk by Shooter4
[Today at 08:50:45 AM]


MA10 launches by Parasite
[Yesterday at 11:37:33 PM]


Muzzle loader elk by Rainier10
[Yesterday at 11:12:01 PM]


Everett Boat Launch by Shrimper
[Yesterday at 10:32:44 PM]


HUNTNNW's 2024 trail cam pics by huntnnw
[Yesterday at 10:01:00 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal