collapse

Advertisement


« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case  (Read 2201 times)

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187
'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« on: May 15, 2024, 09:43:51 AM »
Logged

Offline follow maggie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 3323
  • Location: Fargo
  • Just me, just being a nomad
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2024, 09:53:15 AM »
Hopefully it spreads.
Logged

Offline BA Mongor

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2015
  • Posts: 362
  • Location: Washington Coast
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2024, 04:13:10 PM »
Finally.
I agree, and hope it goes nation wide to STOP their arrogance in thinking they can go wherever they want, when they want!
 
Logged

Offline yogru

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2019
  • Posts: 101
  • Location: Everett
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2024, 04:20:54 PM »
The landowners were awarded nominal damages of $1 for the violations. 
 :twocents:
Logged

Offline CarbonHunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2014
  • Posts: 1176
  • Location: Carbonado
  • Groups: RMEF, WSB
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2024, 06:30:22 PM »
Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

Has anyone seen the WDFW doing this on private property without permission or a warrant?
Logged

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10635
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2024, 09:25:15 AM »


Quote from: CarbonHunter on May 21, 2024, 06:30:22 PM
Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

If I remember correctly, they received a report of on-going hunting violations on the property.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 


* Advertisement

Quick Links

* Recent Topics

Quinault Bear guide/help by capt.coho
[Yesterday at 10:58:14 PM]
Gots me a new/old rockchuck rifle coming by JDHasty
[Yesterday at 10:41:07 PM]
Litefighter tent ? by slowwalker
[Yesterday at 10:25:44 PM]
Need information on having a gunsmith thread a barrel for thin walled chokes. by JDHasty
[Yesterday at 10:23:55 PM]
HUNTNNW 2025 trail cam thread and photos by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 10:22:12 PM]
Looking for Solid 22 LR input by JDHasty
[Yesterday at 10:21:31 PM]
AKC lab puppies! Born 06/10/2025 follow as they grow!!! by JWBINX
[Yesterday at 10:17:37 PM]
49 Degrees North Early Bull Moose by westdcw
[Yesterday at 09:57:25 PM]
Teanaway bull elk by teanawayslayer
[Yesterday at 05:57:24 PM]
Also looking for help deciding on a scope by Sakko300wsm
[Yesterday at 05:49:13 PM]
6mm Creedmoor Gauges by pickardjw
[Yesterday at 01:27:28 PM]
Brittany breeders by ghosthunter
[Yesterday at 01:17:23 PM]
Kings by metlhead
[Yesterday at 12:37:26 PM]
Fullsized Truck Opinion: HiMiNew vs LoMiOlder by rainshadow1
[Yesterday at 11:46:04 AM]
AUCTION: SE Idaho DIY Deer or Deer/Elk Hunt by Karl Blanchard
[Yesterday at 10:47:28 AM]
Velvet by MADMAX
[July 11, 2025, 07:35:16 PM]
Advice for a first time Bear spot and stalk? by Crunchy
[July 11, 2025, 06:02:28 PM]
2025 Canning by Twispriver
[July 11, 2025, 05:00:03 PM]
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal