collapse

Advertisement


« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case  (Read 2198 times)

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187
'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« on: May 15, 2024, 09:43:51 AM »
Logged

Offline follow maggie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 3323
  • Location: Fargo
  • Just me, just being a nomad
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2024, 09:53:15 AM »
Hopefully it spreads.
Logged

Offline BA Mongor

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2015
  • Posts: 362
  • Location: Washington Coast
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2024, 04:13:10 PM »
Finally.
I agree, and hope it goes nation wide to STOP their arrogance in thinking they can go wherever they want, when they want!
 
Logged

Offline yogru

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2019
  • Posts: 101
  • Location: Everett
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2024, 04:20:54 PM »
The landowners were awarded nominal damages of $1 for the violations. 
 :twocents:
Logged

Offline CarbonHunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2014
  • Posts: 1176
  • Location: Carbonado
  • Groups: RMEF, WSB
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2024, 06:30:22 PM »
Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

Has anyone seen the WDFW doing this on private property without permission or a warrant?
Logged

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10634
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2024, 09:25:15 AM »


Quote from: CarbonHunter on May 21, 2024, 06:30:22 PM
Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

If I remember correctly, they received a report of on-going hunting violations on the property.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 


* Advertisement

Quick Links

* Recent Topics

Looking for Solid 22 LR input by Rat44
[Today at 12:26:36 AM]
Lynx kittens confirmed in the Kettle Range by dwils233
[Today at 12:04:14 AM]
Archery elk gear, 2025. by spin05
[Today at 12:03:42 AM]
How To Get Your $0.00 Tax Stamp - Black Hammer Arms by dreadi
[Yesterday at 11:33:25 PM]
AUCTION: SE Idaho DIY Deer or Deer/Elk Hunt by Rainier10
[Yesterday at 10:19:01 PM]
Seeking recommendations on a new scope by Klickitatsteelie
[Yesterday at 09:23:56 PM]
2025 Canning by Twispriver
[Yesterday at 09:15:12 PM]
2025 Montana alternate list by Edminsterquality
[Yesterday at 08:47:06 PM]
WSTA 2025 Summer Rendezvous Agenda by Trapper John
[Yesterday at 08:00:27 PM]
First attempt at polish sausages by Stein
[Yesterday at 07:58:22 PM]
Fullsized Truck Opinion: HiMiNew vs LoMiOlder by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 07:57:22 PM]
Sockeye Numbers by Southpole
[Yesterday at 07:44:30 PM]
Best all around muzzy (updated) by jjhunter
[Yesterday at 07:44:26 PM]
38% increase in fishing and hunting licenses by Sitka_Blacktail
[Yesterday at 07:02:41 PM]
50 inch SXS and Tracks? by 92xj
[Yesterday at 05:34:03 PM]
3 days for Kings by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 05:06:49 PM]
Full moon and last week of September by pd
[Yesterday at 04:51:23 PM]
Hunting bears in the thick stuff by ghosthunter
[Yesterday at 04:33:46 PM]
GMU 247 Entiat bear hunting by Ridgerunner
[Yesterday at 11:56:01 AM]
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal