collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case  (Read 1206 times)

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187

Offline follow maggie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 3117
  • Location: Fargo
  • Just me, just being a nomad
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2024, 09:53:15 AM »
Hopefully it spreads.

Offline BA Mongor

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2015
  • Posts: 295
  • Location: Washington Coast
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2024, 04:13:10 PM »
Finally.
I agree, and hope it goes nation wide to STOP their arrogance in thinking they can go wherever they want, when they want!
 

Offline yogru

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2019
  • Posts: 81
  • Location: Everett
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2024, 04:20:54 PM »
The landowners were awarded nominal damages of $1 for the violations. 
 :twocents:

Offline CarbonHunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2014
  • Posts: 682
  • Location: Carbonado
  • Groups: RMEF, WSB
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2024, 06:30:22 PM »
Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

Has anyone seen the WDFW doing this on private property without permission or a warrant?

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10377
Re: 'Massive win for property rights' in major warrantless search case
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2024, 09:25:15 AM »


Why were they installing cameras on private property in the first place?

If I remember correctly, they received a report of on-going hunting violations on the property.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk


 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Idaho trout fishing by mboyle0828
[Today at 08:52:04 PM]


The best anti-bear pistol and round.. by WapitiTalk1
[Today at 08:40:16 PM]


Biden Admin Asks Appeals Court to Remove ESA Protections for Gray Wolves by bigtex
[Today at 08:37:13 PM]


All-Around Big Game Caliber by jasnt
[Today at 07:20:38 PM]


Expect USFS Land Conditions to Worsen by Naches Sportsman
[Today at 06:47:04 PM]


High Hunt 2024- Its Almost Time!!! by robescc
[Today at 05:46:57 PM]


Quiet in the elk woods. by NOCK NOCK
[Today at 04:35:38 PM]


Hornady ELD-X: Explodes Like A Varmint Bullet?! by lewy
[Today at 02:44:28 PM]


Brewster by Southpole
[Today at 11:45:31 AM]


New WDFW Bobcat Rules- Absolute BS by LHaub
[Today at 11:36:29 AM]


Hunting buddy in King County area by kingwtyler2013@gmail.com
[Today at 11:36:04 AM]


Blacktail for a new Washington hunter by chukardogs
[Today at 11:32:03 AM]


Scouting the Col. for Elk by Dragosani
[Today at 10:59:32 AM]


Rant out by dilleytech
[Today at 10:42:10 AM]


Fall chinook by MADMAX
[Today at 10:34:53 AM]


Coturnix Quail by LDennis24
[Today at 09:46:44 AM]


Colockum Archery Bull by Pinetar
[Today at 08:46:58 AM]


Non grip traps (muskrat float) by Norman89
[Today at 08:41:45 AM]


Anybody breeding meat rabbit? by Norman89
[Today at 08:29:28 AM]


Waiting period by BrandonD
[Yesterday at 11:26:18 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal