Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: Oh Mah on September 22, 2020, 09:08:12 AMQuote from: Jonathan_S on September 22, 2020, 08:15:11 AMQuote from: full choke on September 22, 2020, 08:10:39 AMQuote from: Jonathan_S on September 22, 2020, 08:00:19 AMQuote from: jrebel on September 22, 2020, 07:47:46 AMRather than ban E-bikes, quads, dual sports, etc. etc. etc......wouldn't be easier to just designate "walk in only" areas. If there is a gate on the road post the gate. If there is a trailhead, post the trailhead. Idaho does this and it appears to be working. Some of Idaho's gates only allow horseback or foot traffic, others allow quads uder 50"...and some are open to whatever you want to drive or ride on it. Next thing you know, the same hunting group that hates e-bikes will be wanting to ban equestrian travel. Then it will be gate all roads and only the elite athlete has the right to hunt. Where does it end? For the record, I am not an e-bike owner. I believe this misses the mark. Horses are not new technology, ebikes are. This is just the process of figuring out where they fit in the scheme of (motorized) travel.No dog in this fight, but why would it matter if it was a horse or an ebike? Both provide an advantage to the user vs the walk in guy. Both damage trails, both allow some people to access an area that they may not otherwise be able to access. I do not see a real big difference?There are horse trails and bike trails and there are motorized trails. Sometimes they overlap and sometimes they don't. I don't think it's a big difference either but it is a difference and I think ebikes are finding their place which is motorized travel A lot of people with limits have turned to ebikes to travel in the outdoors.WE CAN ALL SHARE THE OUTDOORS,WE DON'T NEED SEGRIGATION OUTSIDE TOO DO WE?Umm we have it. Seasons, restrictions, closed roads, equipment, weapon choice, trail types, wilderness, permits...Quote from: trophyhunt on September 22, 2020, 09:28:00 AMQuote from: Jonathan_S on September 22, 2020, 08:41:41 AMMr. @trophyhunt, Jerry, I asked this earlier can you please give me your thoughts?Now answer me this...You say they don't offer much of an advantage over a mountain bike. Why spend the money then? How can somebody who hasn't ridden one not have a clue what they're talking about but an Ebike doesn't offer an advantage? How can those things both be true?sorry Jon, work got in the way, lol. I spent the money because I had false hopes of it being better, I thought the bike would take me miles on our hills. I thought I’d be easier to pack in and pack out, I turned 51 this year and staying in shape gets harder each year. When I never rode one, my impression was they were more like a dirt bike, I never realized how much physical work is still needed. I rode an older one a friend owns and wasn’t too impressed, but I figured the new models were better, mine is better but not what I expected. I said people who haven’t ridden them don’t have a clue because I was that person, I didn’t really have a clue how good/bad they worked until I bought one. I’d say the biggest advantage is, if your not in Karl Blanchard shape, lol, you don’t end up pushing your bike and cart up the hill. But you still have to work, you can’t just push the throttle and expect it to make any big hill, you have to pedal. I feel for ya on that. I agree with the earlier stated sentiment of getting out ahead of technology improvements and knowing that ebikes will only get "better" is enough in my mind to restrict them now. Even IF they aren't currently much of an advantage.
Quote from: Jonathan_S on September 22, 2020, 08:15:11 AMQuote from: full choke on September 22, 2020, 08:10:39 AMQuote from: Jonathan_S on September 22, 2020, 08:00:19 AMQuote from: jrebel on September 22, 2020, 07:47:46 AMRather than ban E-bikes, quads, dual sports, etc. etc. etc......wouldn't be easier to just designate "walk in only" areas. If there is a gate on the road post the gate. If there is a trailhead, post the trailhead. Idaho does this and it appears to be working. Some of Idaho's gates only allow horseback or foot traffic, others allow quads uder 50"...and some are open to whatever you want to drive or ride on it. Next thing you know, the same hunting group that hates e-bikes will be wanting to ban equestrian travel. Then it will be gate all roads and only the elite athlete has the right to hunt. Where does it end? For the record, I am not an e-bike owner. I believe this misses the mark. Horses are not new technology, ebikes are. This is just the process of figuring out where they fit in the scheme of (motorized) travel.No dog in this fight, but why would it matter if it was a horse or an ebike? Both provide an advantage to the user vs the walk in guy. Both damage trails, both allow some people to access an area that they may not otherwise be able to access. I do not see a real big difference?There are horse trails and bike trails and there are motorized trails. Sometimes they overlap and sometimes they don't. I don't think it's a big difference either but it is a difference and I think ebikes are finding their place which is motorized travel A lot of people with limits have turned to ebikes to travel in the outdoors.WE CAN ALL SHARE THE OUTDOORS,WE DON'T NEED SEGRIGATION OUTSIDE TOO DO WE?
Quote from: full choke on September 22, 2020, 08:10:39 AMQuote from: Jonathan_S on September 22, 2020, 08:00:19 AMQuote from: jrebel on September 22, 2020, 07:47:46 AMRather than ban E-bikes, quads, dual sports, etc. etc. etc......wouldn't be easier to just designate "walk in only" areas. If there is a gate on the road post the gate. If there is a trailhead, post the trailhead. Idaho does this and it appears to be working. Some of Idaho's gates only allow horseback or foot traffic, others allow quads uder 50"...and some are open to whatever you want to drive or ride on it. Next thing you know, the same hunting group that hates e-bikes will be wanting to ban equestrian travel. Then it will be gate all roads and only the elite athlete has the right to hunt. Where does it end? For the record, I am not an e-bike owner. I believe this misses the mark. Horses are not new technology, ebikes are. This is just the process of figuring out where they fit in the scheme of (motorized) travel.No dog in this fight, but why would it matter if it was a horse or an ebike? Both provide an advantage to the user vs the walk in guy. Both damage trails, both allow some people to access an area that they may not otherwise be able to access. I do not see a real big difference?There are horse trails and bike trails and there are motorized trails. Sometimes they overlap and sometimes they don't. I don't think it's a big difference either but it is a difference and I think ebikes are finding their place which is motorized travel
Quote from: Jonathan_S on September 22, 2020, 08:00:19 AMQuote from: jrebel on September 22, 2020, 07:47:46 AMRather than ban E-bikes, quads, dual sports, etc. etc. etc......wouldn't be easier to just designate "walk in only" areas. If there is a gate on the road post the gate. If there is a trailhead, post the trailhead. Idaho does this and it appears to be working. Some of Idaho's gates only allow horseback or foot traffic, others allow quads uder 50"...and some are open to whatever you want to drive or ride on it. Next thing you know, the same hunting group that hates e-bikes will be wanting to ban equestrian travel. Then it will be gate all roads and only the elite athlete has the right to hunt. Where does it end? For the record, I am not an e-bike owner. I believe this misses the mark. Horses are not new technology, ebikes are. This is just the process of figuring out where they fit in the scheme of (motorized) travel.No dog in this fight, but why would it matter if it was a horse or an ebike? Both provide an advantage to the user vs the walk in guy. Both damage trails, both allow some people to access an area that they may not otherwise be able to access. I do not see a real big difference?
Quote from: jrebel on September 22, 2020, 07:47:46 AMRather than ban E-bikes, quads, dual sports, etc. etc. etc......wouldn't be easier to just designate "walk in only" areas. If there is a gate on the road post the gate. If there is a trailhead, post the trailhead. Idaho does this and it appears to be working. Some of Idaho's gates only allow horseback or foot traffic, others allow quads uder 50"...and some are open to whatever you want to drive or ride on it. Next thing you know, the same hunting group that hates e-bikes will be wanting to ban equestrian travel. Then it will be gate all roads and only the elite athlete has the right to hunt. Where does it end? For the record, I am not an e-bike owner. I believe this misses the mark. Horses are not new technology, ebikes are. This is just the process of figuring out where they fit in the scheme of (motorized) travel.
Rather than ban E-bikes, quads, dual sports, etc. etc. etc......wouldn't be easier to just designate "walk in only" areas. If there is a gate on the road post the gate. If there is a trailhead, post the trailhead. Idaho does this and it appears to be working. Some of Idaho's gates only allow horseback or foot traffic, others allow quads uder 50"...and some are open to whatever you want to drive or ride on it. Next thing you know, the same hunting group that hates e-bikes will be wanting to ban equestrian travel. Then it will be gate all roads and only the elite athlete has the right to hunt. Where does it end? For the record, I am not an e-bike owner.
Quote from: Jonathan_S on September 22, 2020, 08:41:41 AMMr. @trophyhunt, Jerry, I asked this earlier can you please give me your thoughts?Now answer me this...You say they don't offer much of an advantage over a mountain bike. Why spend the money then? How can somebody who hasn't ridden one not have a clue what they're talking about but an Ebike doesn't offer an advantage? How can those things both be true?sorry Jon, work got in the way, lol. I spent the money because I had false hopes of it being better, I thought the bike would take me miles on our hills. I thought I’d be easier to pack in and pack out, I turned 51 this year and staying in shape gets harder each year. When I never rode one, my impression was they were more like a dirt bike, I never realized how much physical work is still needed. I rode an older one a friend owns and wasn’t too impressed, but I figured the new models were better, mine is better but not what I expected. I said people who haven’t ridden them don’t have a clue because I was that person, I didn’t really have a clue how good/bad they worked until I bought one. I’d say the biggest advantage is, if your not in Karl Blanchard shape, lol, you don’t end up pushing your bike and cart up the hill. But you still have to work, you can’t just push the throttle and expect it to make any big hill, you have to pedal.
Mr. @trophyhunt, Jerry, I asked this earlier can you please give me your thoughts?Now answer me this...You say they don't offer much of an advantage over a mountain bike. Why spend the money then? How can somebody who hasn't ridden one not have a clue what they're talking about but an Ebike doesn't offer an advantage? How can those things both be true?
I'm curious, all you haters, do you have any bad examples of ebike riders in the woods ruining your hunt? Was it behind a non motorized gate or did they just beat you to a spot? I've been in the woods most my life and don't think I've even seen one in the woods?
Quote from: Jonathan_S on September 22, 2020, 09:35:37 AMQuote from: Oh Mah on September 22, 2020, 09:08:12 AMQuote from: Jonathan_S on September 22, 2020, 08:15:11 AMQuote from: full choke on September 22, 2020, 08:10:39 AMQuote from: Jonathan_S on September 22, 2020, 08:00:19 AMQuote from: jrebel on September 22, 2020, 07:47:46 AMRather than ban E-bikes, quads, dual sports, etc. etc. etc......wouldn't be easier to just designate "walk in only" areas. If there is a gate on the road post the gate. If there is a trailhead, post the trailhead. Idaho does this and it appears to be working. Some of Idaho's gates only allow horseback or foot traffic, others allow quads uder 50"...and some are open to whatever you want to drive or ride on it. Next thing you know, the same hunting group that hates e-bikes will be wanting to ban equestrian travel. Then it will be gate all roads and only the elite athlete has the right to hunt. Where does it end? For the record, I am not an e-bike owner. I believe this misses the mark. Horses are not new technology, ebikes are. This is just the process of figuring out where they fit in the scheme of (motorized) travel.No dog in this fight, but why would it matter if it was a horse or an ebike? Both provide an advantage to the user vs the walk in guy. Both damage trails, both allow some people to access an area that they may not otherwise be able to access. I do not see a real big difference?There are horse trails and bike trails and there are motorized trails. Sometimes they overlap and sometimes they don't. I don't think it's a big difference either but it is a difference and I think ebikes are finding their place which is motorized travel A lot of people with limits have turned to ebikes to travel in the outdoors.WE CAN ALL SHARE THE OUTDOORS,WE DON'T NEED SEGRIGATION OUTSIDE TOO DO WE?Umm we have it. Seasons, restrictions, closed roads, equipment, weapon choice, trail types, wilderness, permits...Quote from: trophyhunt on September 22, 2020, 09:28:00 AMQuote from: Jonathan_S on September 22, 2020, 08:41:41 AMMr. @trophyhunt, Jerry, I asked this earlier can you please give me your thoughts?Now answer me this...You say they don't offer much of an advantage over a mountain bike. Why spend the money then? How can somebody who hasn't ridden one not have a clue what they're talking about but an Ebike doesn't offer an advantage? How can those things both be true?sorry Jon, work got in the way, lol. I spent the money because I had false hopes of it being better, I thought the bike would take me miles on our hills. I thought I’d be easier to pack in and pack out, I turned 51 this year and staying in shape gets harder each year. When I never rode one, my impression was they were more like a dirt bike, I never realized how much physical work is still needed. I rode an older one a friend owns and wasn’t too impressed, but I figured the new models were better, mine is better but not what I expected. I said people who haven’t ridden them don’t have a clue because I was that person, I didn’t really have a clue how good/bad they worked until I bought one. I’d say the biggest advantage is, if your not in Karl Blanchard shape, lol, you don’t end up pushing your bike and cart up the hill. But you still have to work, you can’t just push the throttle and expect it to make any big hill, you have to pedal. I feel for ya on that. I agree with the earlier stated sentiment of getting out ahead of technology improvements and knowing that ebikes will only get "better" is enough in my mind to restrict them now. Even IF they aren't currently much of an advantage.agree, I’d like to see wa access, gates and restrictions be more like Idaho. Seems every user group is taken care of and the hunting is good.
A list of all the things Karen is trying to ban and some on here are helping.E BIKESSCOPES ON MUZZLE LOADERSBREACH LOADED MUZZIESSNOW MOBILESJEEPSJET SKIIS4 WHEELERSDIRT BIKESBARBED HOOKSFISH HATCHERIESTRAPPINGSNARESBOX TRAPSHUNTINGETC.THE LIST IS LONG AND THERE ARE A LOT OF KARENS IN THIS STATE,DON'T BE A KAREN.
WDFW is trying to go around law makers,on E BIKES.My self and others are seeking answers,to why?They have gone to the attorney generals office to ban E BIKES,on WDFW and sounds like,DNR LANDS in the state.
This thread is also about banning something used by outdoor recs.and that includes everything else thats banned in my opinion.All the user groups need to work together more.For the better of all outdoor not just a group.the photo enthusiast can take photos while someone is hunting can't they?